Bacillus Coagulans Suppliers & Manufacturers
Identifiers
Hazards
What does available trade activity indicate for Bacillus coagulans?
Bacillus coagulans is classified under HS Code 2918.11. This falls under Chapter 29: Organic chemicals, specifically Heading 2918 (Acids; carboxylic acid with additional oxygen function and their anhydrides, halides, peroxides, peroxyacids; their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives), under subheading: Acids; carboxylic acids, (with alcohol function but without other oxygen function), lactic acid, its salts and esters.
* The data below is specific to the HS code, not the ingredient.
Suppliers
218
Across 34 countries
Shipments
6,540
from 2015 to 2026
Total weight
143.4M kg
11,237 TEU · standard 20-foot container units
Last shipment
6 months ago
Last updated at Feb 25, 2026
Growth
↑ 46%
Trade under 2918.11 has increased by 46% over the past 6 months
What does trade activity suggest about the bacillus coagulans supply chain?
Trade activity under HS code 3002.49 suggests a supply chain dominated by large fermentation and biological product companies, with 42 suppliers and 153 shipments totaling over 3,100 metric tons between September 2022 and February 2026. The presence of major players like Chr Hansen, Danisco, DSM, and Novozymes indicates that the supply chain is integrated with broader microbial and pharmaceutical production. However, this activity is not confirmed to be ingredient-specific to Bacillus coagulans, as the HS code covers a range of microbial products. The recent growth score of 31.9 suggests moderate expansion, but the data does not isolate Bacillus coagulans volumes, so the signal is indicative rather than definitive.
What does the HS or HTS classification include, and where are its limits for bacillus coagulans?
HS code 3002.49 falls under Chapter 30 (Pharmaceutical products) and covers toxins, cultures of micro-organisms (excluding yeasts), and similar products not elsewhere specified. This classification is broad and includes various microbial cultures, vaccines, and immunological products, meaning it is not exclusive to Bacillus coagulans. The match to Bacillus coagulans was made via a classifier with high confidence, but the code's scope means that shipments may include other microbial products. Therefore, trade volumes and supplier counts should be interpreted as upper-bound estimates for Bacillus coagulans activity, not precise measurements. This limitation is critical for supply chain planning, as actual Bacillus coagulans volumes could be significantly lower.
Which suppliers are associated with Bacillus coagulans trade?
| Supplier | Shipments | Top customer | Growth | Last shipment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No suppliers found. | |||||
How concentrated or diversified does the supplier landscape appear for bacillus coagulans?
The supplier landscape appears moderately concentrated, with the top five suppliers (E Nema, Chr Hansen, Novozymes France, Danisco Deutschland, and DSM Food Specialties) accounting for 64 of 153 shipments (about 42%). Germany hosts the largest number of suppliers (13), but many countries have only one or two, indicating a mix of established players and smaller entities. This suggests a diversified but not fragmented market, with a few key players likely controlling significant capacity. For procurement, this implies potential supply security from multiple sources, but also the need to assess the specific capabilities of each supplier for Bacillus coagulans, as the data does not confirm their product focus.
Which supply risks or dependencies around bacillus coagulans require further diligence?
Key supply risks include the lack of ingredient-specific shipment data, which means volumes and supplier counts may include other microbial products. Additionally, several suppliers show recent activity but without explicit manufacturer designation, so their role as direct Bacillus coagulans producers is uncertain. The broad HS code classification also raises regulatory and quality risks, as shipments may not be food-grade. Further diligence should verify each supplier's product portfolio, confirm Bacillus coagulans-specific production, and assess compliance with food-grade standards. The presence of major fermentation companies suggests potential for reliable supply, but the data does not guarantee ingredient-specific availability.
Which sourcing geographies and trade lanes appear most relevant to bacillus coagulans?
Germany is the most prominent sourcing geography, with 13 suppliers and 75 shipments accounting for over 2.2 million kg, followed by France, Italy, and Canada. The data suggests a strong European supply base, with additional activity in Argentina, Brazil, China, and India. Trade lanes appear to connect these suppliers to customers in the US and other markets, as evidenced by top customers like Danisco USA and Profarm Group US. However, the data does not specify whether these lanes are for Bacillus coagulans specifically or other microbial products under the same HS code. For sourcing strategy, Europe, particularly Germany, is a key region to engage, but verification of ingredient-specific shipments is necessary.
Which countries drive Bacillus coagulans trade activity?
By shipment count
Belgium
2,603 shipments
30 suppliers
55.4M kg total weight
Netherlands
1,436 shipments
14 suppliers
36.6M kg total weight
China
703 shipments
53 suppliers
15.1M kg total weight
Ireland
669 shipments
2 suppliers
13.1M kg total weight
Spain
309 shipments
14 suppliers
8.9M kg total weight
Thailand
240 shipments
1 suppliers
5.4M kg total weight
Japan
167 shipments
11 suppliers
2.6M kg total weight
India
88 shipments
10 suppliers
1.2M kg total weight
Germany
48 shipments
16 suppliers
592.4K kg total weight
United Kingdom
48 shipments
9 suppliers
146.2K kg total weight