Rebaudioside M Suppliers & Manufacturers
Identifiers
Functions
What does available trade activity indicate for Rebaudioside m?
Rebaudioside m is classified under HS Code 1302.19. This falls under Chapter 13: Lac; gums, resins and other vegetable saps and extracts, specifically Heading 1302 (Vegetable saps and extracts; pectic substances, pectinates and pectates; agar-agar and other mucilages and thickeners, whether or not modified, derived from vegetable products), under subheading: Vegetable saps and extracts; n.e.c. in item no. 1302.1.
* The data below is specific to the HS code, not the ingredient.
Suppliers
1,393
Across 76 countries
Shipments
10,957
from 2015 to 2026
Total weight
165.3M kg
15,939 TEU · standard 20-foot container units
Last shipment
6 months ago
Last updated at Feb 25, 2026
Growth
↑ 49%
Trade under 1302.19 has increased by 49% over the past 6 months
What does trade activity suggest about the rebaudioside M supply chain?
Trade activity under HS 1302.19 indicates a large, active supply chain for vegetable saps and extracts, with 1,393 suppliers and 10,957 shipments recorded between 2015 and 2026. This scale suggests robust global movement of botanical extracts, but it is not evidence of rebaudioside M-specific volumes. The presence of major flavor and fragrance houses alongside botanical extractors implies the classification captures diverse product categories, including aloe vera and other plant extracts. For rebaudioside M, this data provides context on the broader extract supply environment rather than confirming dedicated steviol glycoside trade flows.
What does the HS or HTS classification include, and where are its limits for rebaudioside M?
HS code 1302.19 covers 'vegetable saps and extracts; n.e.c. in item no. 1302.1,' a broad category that includes a wide range of plant-derived materials beyond stevia or rebaudioside M. The classification scope is therefore expansive, capturing everything from aloe vera to medical plant extracts and food additives. Its limits for rebaudioside M are significant: the data cannot confirm that any specific shipment contains rebaudioside M, nor can it distinguish between different steviol glycosides or other extract types. This classification provides supply-chain context for botanical extracts generally, not for rebaudioside M specifically.
Which suppliers are associated with Rebaudioside m trade?
| Supplier | Shipments | Top customer | Growth | Last shipment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No suppliers found. | |||||
How concentrated or diversified does the supplier landscape appear for rebaudioside M?
The supplier landscape appears highly diversified, with 1,393 distinct suppliers across 76 countries, indicating a fragmented market under HS 1302.19. No single supplier dominates; the top entities, such as Omniactive Health Technologies, Chile Botanics, and Symrise, each account for a small fraction of total shipments. This diversification suggests multiple sourcing options for botanical extracts generally. For rebaudioside M, however, the data does not confirm which suppliers actually manufacture or trade this specific ingredient, so the apparent diversification may not translate to rebaudioside M supply security.
Which supply risks or dependencies around rebaudioside M require further diligence?
Further diligence is required to confirm which suppliers under HS 1302.19 actually produce or trade rebaudioside M, as the current data cannot attribute shipments to this specific ingredient. Key risks include potential over-reliance on broad extract suppliers whose rebaudioside M capabilities are unverified, and the possibility that high-volume shippers are moving unrelated products like aloe vera or other plant extracts. Additionally, the presence of logistics providers and trading companies in the data introduces intermediary risk, where supply chain control and ingredient traceability may be less direct. Supplier-specific verification of rebaudioside M manufacturing status is essential before procurement decisions.
Which sourcing geographies and trade lanes appear most relevant to rebaudioside M?
The most relevant sourcing geographies are China, India, Mexico, France, Germany, and Brazil, which together account for the largest supplier counts and shipment volumes under HS 1302.19. China leads with 229 suppliers and 1,699 shipments, followed by India with 186 suppliers and 1,576 shipments. Mexico and Brazil show high weight volumes, suggesting bulk extract movement. These countries are prominent in botanical extraction and flavor industries, aligning with the classification's scope. However, this does not confirm rebaudioside M-specific trade lanes, as the data reflects broad extract activity across many product types.
Which countries drive Rebaudioside m trade activity?
By shipment count
China
1,699 shipments
229 suppliers
14.2M kg total weight
India
1,576 shipments
186 suppliers
14.7M kg total weight
Mexico
880 shipments
105 suppliers
17.3M kg total weight
France
816 shipments
87 suppliers
3.7M kg total weight
Germany
701 shipments
70 suppliers
14.8M kg total weight
South Korea
612 shipments
121 suppliers
3.1M kg total weight
Brazil
560 shipments
69 suppliers
31.4M kg total weight
Spain
409 shipments
60 suppliers
2.4M kg total weight
Chile
404 shipments
21 suppliers
3.3M kg total weight
Thailand
397 shipments
2 suppliers
6M kg total weight